On Jun 2, 11:41 am, Roger Oberholtzer <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 05:33 -0700, Steve Povilaitis wrote:
> > I'm sure Bitten and Buildbot are fine tools, but I haven't used them,
> > so I won't compare them to Hudson. What I like about Hudson is the
> > large number of plugins, tight integration with SVN and Trac, ease of
> > installation, and configurability.
>
> Is hudson really for Java developers? There is lots of talk of tracking
> which jars are made (fingerprinting). Or does it works as well building
> and testing, say, C code?
>
> --
> Roger Oberholtzer
>
It's definitely not just for Java. I actually use it to build .Net
projects using NAnt, then test using the NUnit plugin and the FXCop
NAnt task, and historically track my testing coverage using the
Violations plugin. Build failures are sent out via IM using the
opensource jabber protocol.
Since Hudson also has the capability to execute batch files or monitor
external jobs, you could use it to run make for C code as well.
Steve
> OPQ Systems / Ramböll RST
>
> Ramböll Sverige AB
> Krukmakargatan 21
> P.O. Box 17009
> SE-104 62 Stockholm, Sweden
>
> Office: Int +46 8-615 60 20
> Mobile: Int +46 70-815 1696
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
