Lance Hendrix wrote: > In line with your note, perhaps you could suggest a few items (or a > few topics) that you especially feel would be important/critical/useful > to develop (what were you unable to find documentation about). IMHO one > of the biggest issues facing the adoption of OSS is the lack of > documentation and as a result one of my major objectives to support > the OSS effort is to attempt to provide or at least assist with the > development of (I am capable of at generating content quickly, I'll > let someone else be the judge of it's usefulness) documentation; however, > in order to be most useful, I think the effort should be driven by the > community (as to what to develop). > > In short, while you could develop the documentation yourself (as has > been suggested), there is also the option of assisting or > collaborating with someone (me?) to help improve the documentation. > > Anyone else with any documentation requests would also be welcome. (I > know, be careful what you wish for...)
I have trouble getting started generating content and I'm no Trac expert. I am, however, an good editor (and married to an excellent editor) and would try to clean up drafts others may submit. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
