On Jul 22, 8:55 am, ray <[email protected]> wrote: > Olemis, > > Thank you for your considerations. I will march forward. > > Why Python 2.6? Because I only want to be far enough forward on the > bleeding edge that if I fall, death is quick and I won't be walking > around thinking I'm alive. > > Ray > > On Jul 22, 7:33 am, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:21 AM, ray<[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi ! > > > > I would like help in reviewing of what I think is the sequence and > > > content of the installation process: > > > > From reviewing documentation, it looks like - > > [...] > > > > Track 11.5 [ 1) There is a windows zip and installer, what is the > > > difference?] > > > No diff at all . > > > {{{ > > $ unzip Trac-xxx.zip > > $ cd Tracxxx > > $ setup.py bdist_wininst bdist_msi ; Windows installer > > $ easy_install -z Trac-xxx.zip ; or alternately install > > using easy_install > > > }}} > > > And you'll get back a Windows installer . Py is magic ! > > > I prefer Wininsts in Windows > > > > Subversion 1.6.3 > > > Python bindings svn-python-1.6.2.win32-py2.6.exe [ 3) I only > > > see binding for 1.6.2, do they work with 1.6.3?] > > > AFAIK No . You should install svn-python-1.6.2.win32-py2.6.exe , which > > available at the same URL where you can find the Subversion win > > installer. > > > Formerly (in some Win hosts ;o) the use of Subversion bindings > > triggered a segfault. The good news is that I tried this version > > (1.6.3) in such a problematic system and it doesnt suffer with that > > bug (so I could finally test my glorious LOCs using SVN backend :P ). > > > > Appache > > > mod_python [ 4) No version for Python 2.6?] > > > I use this one with Py 2.5 > > > What's the benefit in using Py 2.6 ? > > > -- > > Regards, > > > Olemis. > > > Blog ES:http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ > > Blog EN:http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ > > > Featured article:
Make sure you get the correct bindings for the version of Apache you go with (2.0 vs. 2.2, etc) This one has cause a lot of hair loss on this list... You might want to consider going with python 2.5 unless you have the patience and time to work through some of the "bleeding edge" issues as you mentioned. Finally, you may wish to start with the default SQLite backend, although I suspect this to be less of an issue. I personally use mod_python, but that does come with some limitations in terms of performance. If you plan to have a very large number of trac instances/tickets, consider trying to get mod_wsgi going out of the gate. One last thing: It's Trac, not Track. Not Nitpicking here, there is a different system called Track out there somewhere. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
