On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Roger Oberholtzer
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 07:47 -0500, Olemis Lang wrote:
>>>
>>>> You mean that Google didn't document a feature in their products?
>>>> Quite unlikely !
>>>> The only thing I found they didn't document was the way to access data
>>>> in worksheets inside a Google Spreadsheet [2]_, and they updated the
>>>> docs few days after ;o)
>>>
>>> I am sure google documented things for how they thought most folk would
>>> use use them, which in an igoogle web page. To put the gadgets in an
>>> unrelated web page, while obviously supported, seems more of a
>>> challenge. Which is fine. I am up to the challenge.
>>>
>>
>> You're right. I have plans to integrate TracGViz with WYSIWYG plugin,
>> but there are urgent issues that need to be closed before that, add to
>> that I need to survive , and the subsequent (current) limited time
>> (I'm also attending to some lectures ...) I have
>>
>> :-/
>>
>> It's a shame , but it seems the mystical beings (or whatever ...) have
>> designed the world so that I cannot do what I like to do, and survive
>> at the same time.
>>
>>
>>> I guess there is a learning curve here. I am obviously not inserting
>>> something into a spreadsheet at google (I want to use data in my Trac
>>> page). Let's take the example of a map. I need to supply a file with
>>> some sort of locations. How should they be formatted? Street addresses?
>>> Lat/long? Other? There must surely be key words that are recognized in
>>> the _table_query_url data source.
>>
>> Take a look at the example data source for that gadget [2]_ in the gallery 
>> [1]_
>>
>> ;o)
>>
>
> I mean perhaps that's not the exact gadget you'r talking about, but
> it's obvious that if the gadget author doesn't mention how to feed
> data in then nobody can do it.
>

Maybe the most common solution for gadgets in this case could be to
rely on a service (e.g. Google Maps ) and provide the id of the map to
be embedded or OTOH to add an option to the gadget so that users may
specify an URL pointing to KML files ... and both of them would be
handled just fine using the current approach.

-- 
Regards,

Olemis.

Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/

Featured article:

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to