You should use 0.12, no doubt in my mind. On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Olemis Lang <ole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/10/10, yoheeb <yoh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > :o) > > > > > Also, any offline recommendations for automated build, > > NAnt > > > unit testing > > (will be C/C++ and some C# most likely) , > > NUnit, CppUnit > > > and static analysis > > reporting would be great. > > > > NCover, ... > > > -- > Regards, > > Olemis. > > Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ > Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ > > Featured article: > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Trac Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<trac-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
