serrs wrote:
> ...
> I've come to the conclusion that multiproject support probably isn't
> worth it. Which leaves me with Gantt charts as being a hang up.
>
> We would be willing to contribute to some kind of bounty for good
> Gantt support. I really liked the mirroring of tickets that TracGantt
> did in the old days - it was fine for me. Basing it on Milestones
> might be fine too.
>
> I think I'm coming back...
I'm working on improving project management in Trac. To me the two
vital things are task scheduling and a decent Gantt. Beyond that, a WBS
page would be nice but that's down the road.
I've made good progress on a scheudler. It relies on a "Task" interface
which wraps tickets with methods to get estimate, percent complete, due
date, owner, etc. It occurs to me that a Gantt needs many of the same
types of data. My plan is to finish an 0.9-quality scheduler than turn
to beating a Gantt into working with my Task interface. It will likely
be months before I'm there.
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
