Gary Oberbrunner wrote: > Here's a few of the things that bug us right now: there's some mismatch > between Trac's svn-like model of the world and git's;
Yes, most of these shortcomings should be fixed in the context of #1492, and we have a strong incentive to achieve that for 0.13, as we started using Mercurial on t.e.o as well. > Is it appropriate to post git-related bugs or > suggestions to Trac anywhere, or should they all be considered GitPlugin > issues? Everything that isn't directly a GitPlugin issue (slowness due to lots of queries, missing timeline provider) is a Trac core issue. We really want to support DVCS better in 0.13. > For comparison, how's the Mercurial side coming? Pretty much the same. > Are people running non-trivial hg repos in Trac? We have our personal development clones on t.e.o, see at the bottom of: http://trac.edgewall.org/browser > Do they face similar model-mismatch issues? Yes. > How's the performance? Not exceptional, but not bad either. Note that the Mercurial backend does no caching at all, whereas IIRC GitPlugin uses the DB cache. -- Remy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
