pnm wrote: > Is this a safe path for the upgrade on the production machine ie., > from 0.10 to 0.13?
Yes, this is the standard way to upgrade. > Are there any things to watchout/consider taking > this upgrade path? Doing a test upgrade is certainly a good idea, but you did that already. > or do I have to upgrade in increments ie., move from 0.10 -> 0.11 -> > 0.12 -> 0.13 ? That's equivalent, it just takes more time :) The upgrade operations are actually the same, so don't bother going through 0.11 and 0.12. -- Remy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
