>From http://www.python.org/community/ the correct route to request a >python.org mailing list is to email postmaster(at)python.org.
Regards, Alex PS Apologies for using Outlook -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of osimons Sent: 16 August 2012 20:08 To: Trac Users Subject: [Trac] Re: t-h.o down, but community not so much On 16 Aug, 18:09, Steffen Hoffmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 16.08.2012 16:56, schrieb RjOllos: > > On Thursday, August 16, 2012 4:47:34 AM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote: > > > mail.python.org <http://mail.python.org> > > <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo > > <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo>> hosts mailing lists > > for a > > number of python related projects . They may be willing to host > > trac-hacks also. Access to the archive can be public or member only. > > > I can make enquiries if you d like. > > > Yeah, that sounds worth looking into. The current th-users is a > > mailman list. It would be nice if we didn't have to run mailman > > ourselves, and have it tied to the server that server that host trac-hacks. > > +1 from me too. I like the idea of server-independence as well. I've > searched a bit on my own, but didn't find that. Nice idea, and since > they run the same software as the currently down list it might be > possible to move the archives to the new location too. > > I'm very much for starting this ASAP, because this could already fly > before we have t-h.o restored. > > Anyone opposing that move here? I'd love to hear critical arguments > now, not afterwards. :-) Mike set up the trac-hacks mailing list because of his dislike for Google Groups. Before that, all plugin user traffic was part of trac- users group (here) and plugin development was part of trac-dev. With the relative high degree of interest overlap, and relatively low traffic for both lists, I don't see why we can't just revert to that. I'm subscribed at Google Groups, but using "no email" option so that I can just follow traffic on lists by RSS feeds at leisure and reply via web if I need to add my opinion. Each to his/her own, and Google Groups just offers much more flexibility. Anyone in the Trac "mailing community" will already have cleared the Google Groups hurdle and singed up at trac-dev and/or trac-users. If needed, adding a trac- hacks at this same service would be my preference. I haven't really gotten around to subscribing to the trac-hacks mailing list myself, so perhaps my opinion as "non-member" don't count... ;-) :::simon https://www.coderesort.com/u/simon/blog -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en. Think green - keep it on the screen. This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
