Thanks Ryan! I think that's exactly it. I will think about the options and follow-up on that thread if I have any relevant input on this subject.
Miguel On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 9:47:35 PM UTC+1, RjOllos wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:53:36 AM UTC-7, Miguel Almeida wrote: >> >> I have 2 Trac (0.12) projects: >> projectA (in /srv/trac/projectA) >> projectB (in /srv/trac/projectB) >> >> In SVN, both projects live in the same repository, (under trunk/projectA >> and trunk/projectB). >> >> Using CommitTicketUpdater >> <https://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/CommitTicketUpdater>, I added a >> post-commit hook on that repository with two rows: >> trac-admin /srv/trac/projectA/ changeset added $REPOS $REV >> trac-admin /srv/trac/projectB/ changeset added $REPOS $REV >> >> However, if I make a commit in that SVN repo that says (closes #99) it >> will close the tickets in projectA and projectB. >> >> Is it possible to avoid this behaviour? >> The only way I'm envisioning is to create separate SVN repositories for >> these 2 projects, but it seems like an overkill (duplicating the >> configuration, authorisation, etc) just to avoid this problem in Trac. >> >> >> Thank you for your help! >> >> >> Miguel >> > > > It sounds like you are describing the same situation we discussed two > months back in this thread: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/trac-users/dOkdYT4nRK4/ltYdwhokFAAJ > > - Ryan > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/trac-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
