On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 11:54 -0300, Daniel Serodio wrote: > Christopher Creutzig wrote: > > Salvete, > > > > I know there are quite a few systems using trac trunk in production > > environments. Since we are heavily hit by spam (I have succeeded to > > stop most of it being written into our database, but I'll have to > > search for the place where the mails are sent out) and I'd lke to use > > the new filter stuff, I'd like to hear about your experiences, > > especially the bad ones. How much more work did the change to trunk > > cause you? What broke? > For me, what caused the most problems is the change of the default > SQLite (and python bindings) version. In 0.9.x, it's SQLite 2; in trunk > (0.10.x), it's SQLite 3).
No, SQLite3/pysqlite2 have been the default since they were added in 0.9. You probably just happened to install pysqlite2 around the same time you upgraded Trac. In response to the original post, I think you can take the lack of response as an indication that the 0.10 trunk has become pretty stable. An RC release should be made in the near future, but if you're interested in trying out the trunk I think you'll be pretty safe. -- Matthew Good <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Trac mailing list [email protected] http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac
