Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> added the comment: Indeed, I agree the patch generator is doing the right thing in terms of trying to create a patch that applies cleanly to CPython.
For the review patch, I'm happy with generating it locally and uploading it directly - the case of dependent external branches is going to be rare enough that there's no point in expending a lot of effort automating dealing with it. ---------- status: chatting -> resolved _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker <metatrac...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> <http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue428> _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Tracker-discuss mailing list Tracker-discuss@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-discuss
