anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> added the comment: On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Georg Brandl <metatrac...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> wrote: > > There isn't even any real priority setting in this tracker. Now can we > please stop this charade and get on with it?
Do you remember the guy, who were closing tickets on b.p.o just to keep tracker clean? You risk to become the next one. If Tshepang is willing to see this feature on the tracker, I see no reason for anyone to stop him. You expect some Roundup hackers to jump in and help with maintenance, but all hackers are already busy, so why not just let ordinary people work on bite-sized, easy stuff until they gain enough experience to help with your real issues. :) I respect your responsibility to get everything fixed yourself, but you're killing the fun. My advice is to create a priority field to filter out all stuff you're not committed to fix, and let other people experiment. -- anatoly t. ---------- status: resolved -> chatting _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker <metatrac...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> <http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue436> _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Tracker-discuss mailing list Tracker-discuss@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-discuss
