Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> added the comment: Yeah, something simple like your first suggestion should work reasonably well.
Since the "dependencies" and "superceder" nouns are ambiguous about the direction of the relationship, and aren't particularly common words anyway, it's probably better to make all four labels use simpler and more explicit verb forms: "Blocked by:" (current "dependencies" field) "Blocking:" (new field) "Replaced by:" (current "superceders" field) "Replaces:" (new field) _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker <metatrac...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> <http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue420> _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Tracker-discuss mailing list Tracker-discuss@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-discuss
