Guido van Rossum added the comment: Go for that!
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Berker Peksag < metatrac...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> wrote: > > Berker Peksag added the comment: > > I don't see a lot of C issues in the "easy issues" list. I agree that some > of them (including a few pure Python ones) shouldn't be classified as > "easy". > > I'd say we should remove the following issues from the list: > > * http://bugs.python.org/issue1100942 (requires knowledge on times, > Python and C) > * http://bugs.python.org/issue25026 > * http://bugs.python.org/issue18156 > * http://bugs.python.org/issue20265 > * http://bugs.python.org/issue10374 (requires Windows knowledge) > * http://bugs.python.org/issue11697 (needs careful review) > * http://bugs.python.org/issue17561 > * http://bugs.python.org/issue17179 > > ---------- > nosy: +berker.peksag > > _______________________________________________________ > PSF Meta Tracker <metatrac...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> > <http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue605> > _______________________________________________________ > _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker <metatrac...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> <http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue605> _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Tracker-discuss mailing list Tracker-discuss@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-discuss Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
