Jamie McCracken wrote: > Anders Aagaard wrote: > >> Checked out a clean version now and that fixed it. >> >>> >>>> And when taking that out I get the error: >>>> aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not defined >>>> aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not defined >>>> in the libextractor directory. >>>> >>> dont remove dirs please! >> >> I just did a clean checkout and I still get that error. > > you are probably missing some standard automake macros then > > try upgrading automake?
I have these automake releases installed : 1.9.6-r2 1.8.5-r3 1.7.9-r1 1.6.3 1.4_p6 1.5 > > or google for more info on that macro > Tried that first and couldn't find much information. I noticed that gnome-autogen is called aclocal-1.7. I have gnome-common version 2.12, is that version number supposed to be sync'ed with gnome releases? Because if it is I'm way outdated. > You can download a different version of libextractor and use that > (tracker will not build its internal libextractor in that case) I have libextractor installed, and tracker is still trying to build the internal one. (libextractor version 0.5.14 to be specific). > >> >>> >>>> Attaching a theoretically working implementation of ionice. >>>> trackerd.c would have to run the ionice_init() function. I would >>>> have tested it and made it a bit cleaner if I could get the cvs >>>> version compiled at all :P >>>> >>>> Most of the code for ionice is gotten from the snippet in the >>>> Documentation/block/ioprio.txt file in the linux kernel. >>> Correct me If I am wrong, but does not ionice default to the cpu nice >>> value (which is +10 for tracker and +19 for text filters)? >> >> Just tried a nice --adjustment 19 on a process now, and used ionice -p >> <process> to check the ionice level. And it reported ioclass none, >> ioprio 0. (which in the kernel translates to ioclass best effort, >> ioprio 4) >> >>> AFAIK, its linux specific and only in 2.6.13+ so I can't really >>> depend on it. >> >> Might be possible to get configure to check for this, but I'm horrible >> at autotools. > > me too! I hate the auto-foo shit (I always end up copying stuff from > other packages!) > > I dont have ionice support in my kernel so I cant really implement this > but Im happy to accept patches that does (with auto-foo and #ifdefs) > I'll see if I can overcome my hate of autotools and figure this out. _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
