Laurent Aguerreche wrote: > Le lundi 30 octobre 2006 à 02:01 +0000, Jamie McCracken a écrit : >> Laurent Aguerreche wrote: >>> Le vendredi 27 octobre 2006 à 23:01 +0200, Laurent Aguerreche a écrit : >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> Le jeudi 26 octobre 2006 à 17:46 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit : >>>>> On 10/26/06, Laurent Aguerreche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> Le jeudi 26 octobre 2006 à 16:30 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit : >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I got damn excited when I read Jamie's proposal for tracker to be >>>>>>> included in GNOME 2.18. >>>>>>> Unfortunately, when installing the deb (in Debian) linked on >>>>>>> gnome-announce-list today, it tells me that it depends on libc6 >>>>>>> (>=2.4-1) while Debian is surely going to release with 2.3.6, in >>>>>>> December. Is there a way in which you can accomodate debian users, >>>>>>> without them resorting to compilation? >>>>>> I'm currently working on these packages : >>>>>> - add a new package tracker-gnome-search-tool >>>>>> - some cleanups >>>>> Nice stuff. >>>> I send a patch that: >>>> - add a new tracker-gnome-search-tool package; >>>> - remove issues with --rpath [0]; >>>> - add --as-needed for ld to remove unnecessary library dependencies; >>>> - add linda overrides for warnings about wrong "changelog.gz" names. It >>>> happens because Tracker is seen as a native debian package. But it can >>>> be consider that debian packages and releases of Tracker are >>>> independents... so the overrides; >>>> - some cleanups (unnecessary files, backup files still there, etc.) >>>> >>>> >>>> [0]: http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue >>> This patch made tracker-utils and tracker-gnome-search-tool depending >>> only to libtrackerclient0, not libtrackerclient0 (= 0.5.0). This new >>> patch fixes it (and it is also cumulative). >>> >>> >> thanks have applied to cvs >> >> It did not apply totally clean - can you check from a fresh check out >> (in a different directory) that its all there > > There are still files that are generated during debian package building > and the "rules" file is missing some things. > So I send a patch (and I tested it in spite of building issues. Good > news is that "ioprio support" says "Yes" at configure. :-) ). > > thanks applied but only rules was updated - please let me know if any of the following need adding to cvs in debian folder:
? tracker-utils.substvars ? tracker-utils ? tracker ? tmp ? libtrackerclient0.substvars ? libtrackerclient0.postrm.debhelper ? libtrackerclient0.postinst.debhelper ? libtrackerclient0-dev ? libtrackerclient0 -- Mr Jamie McCracken http://jamiemcc.livejournal.com/ _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
