My experience in running tracker for a couple of weeks on Edgy:
RAM: Tracker generally doesn't consume more that 3mb of RAM (except when doing the initial indexing). Disk usage: Similar to Eyan's, about 30mb per 10GB indexed. My ~/.Tracker uses 31GB with the following tracker-stats for my home folder which is mostly documents: Videos : 2 Music : 61 Development Files : 107 Text Files : 765 Folders : 1083 Other Files : 1618 Images : 3004 Documents : 12923 Total files indexed : 19563 On 11/16/06, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/16/06, Eyal Oren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/16/06/11/06 00:21 +0000, Jamie McCracken wrote: > >this is another area we really beat Beagle too and a lot of other indexers > >- disk usage. > > > >less than 70MB including full text for 200GB is excellent! > hmm. on my system tracker uses quite some more diskspace, and I have not > more than 30Gb indexed: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ du -hs .Tracker/ > 95M .Tracker/ > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ tracker-stats > > -------fetching index stats--------- > Videos : 23 > Music : 1085 > Development Files : 3030 > Images : 5075 > Text Files : 5155 > Folders : 6517 > Documents : 8111 > Other Files : 16701 > Total files indexed : 45697 > ------------------------------------ > > > is that ok? I think it's okay, because I actually posted my du output before trackerd finished indexing (it was stalled by tracker-extract which was stuck on some DVD vob files), and you have a whole lot of text files, far more than me, I think. _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
-- "Impossible is nothing."
_______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
