Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > On 1/11/07, Jamie McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Deji Akingunola wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On 1/11/07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Please review and comment if this patch is a good idea or not: >> >> It removes the code for the fallback option of opening folders with >> >> nautilus when xdg-utils is not installed. The consequence is that one >> >> must have xdg-utils installed for this to work. >> > What's the reasoning behind this? The fallback is good for folks >> > without xdg-utils, for instance in Fedora, we don't have xdg-utils. >> > Please drop this change. >> >> there is no runtime dependency on xdg-utils >> >> the patch falls back to gnome-open if the spawn of xdg-open fails so it >> should be ok? > > The patch actually gets rid of the fallback and that's why Deji complains. >
ahh yes (missed the minus on the open_with_nautilus line) best play safe and keep both methods of opening -- Mr Jamie McCracken http://jamiemcc.livejournal.com/ _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
