On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:43:53 +0100 jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 02:13 -0700, Brian Davis wrote: > > Jamie, it's great to have you back. Things picked up in my life as > > well and Hum development stagnated a bit. I was cleaning up some > > bugs when I realized that the metadata issue I was whining about > > never seemed to go away for me. Any calls I make to > > "tracker_metadata_get()" return pointers to empty arrays. > > > > I'd love to find out that I'm misusing the API, but the trackerd > > logs appear to be properly extracting and returning the correct > > metadata. > > > > You had mentioned a few months ago that this was a known issue. Is > > there a fix in the pipeline? > > > > should be fixed in latest svn - you must reindex to see the metadata > though as the original bug occurred while indexing the data > > let me know if it solves your problems > > jamie. > >
I recompiled after some initial difficulty. There was an error where the "aclocal" directory appeared to have been hard-coded as /opt/gnome/share/aclocal, when mine is /usr/share/aclocal. I'm too tired to mess with autotools, so I just created a soft link and compilation ran successfully to completion. I reindexed, but continue to have difficulty getting any metadata to show up in Hum's search results. Any ideas? User error? Brian _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
