Make sense for me, I'll waiting for Jamie's review. Halton. On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 04:26 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2007/11/24, Halton Huo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi Michael, > > > > Does it means no comments is auto-approval? How long will be the > > timeout? Then can I commit the patch for t-p? > > > > Hi Halton, > > I had discussed these issues with jamie on irc and he already approved > it more or less. > I simply wanted to get some input on the usage of mktemp. > The patch itself is rather straigthforward and obvious and as such > doesn't really need much review. > > So I don't think that we can take this example as a guideline for > auto-approval. > For more invasive code changes it makes sense if jamie gives his ok (I > don't know if this is the case for your patch. Haven't taken a look at > it). > > In addition I'll be offline for some days now and wanted to have this > patch in 0.6.4. That's why I committed it today without waiting > longer. > > Cheers, > Michael >
_______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
