On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:18:02 +0100, Ivan Frade <[email protected]> wrote: > hi, > > I think that property should have cardinality N. It looks like a bug > in the ontology. OK, if we can push that fix then...
> > On the other hand, nobody is using yet that property. Is anybody > working on a miner retrieving data from imdb? }:-) Sssshhhh don't tell it, it's a secret! > > ivan > > On 2/18/10, Philip Van Hoof <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 23:07 +0100, Adrien Bustany wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> in the nmm ontology, we currently have nmm:leadActor, with a max >>> cardinality of 1. What should I do if I want to store more actors ? >>> Creating a "virtual" artist with a comma delimited name seems quite >>> hackish >> >> >> Can you give us a full use-case for this? >> >> >> -- >> Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer >> home: me at pvanhoof dot be >> gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org >> http://pvanhoof.be/blog >> http://codeminded.be >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tracker-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list >> _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
