>So, I created a new branch for the issue: miner-fs-merge-updates
>
>I couldn't use your patch, as it was not aligned with master, so I
>rewrote it with some additional things, you can check it here:
>http://git.gnome.org/browse/tracker/commit/?h=miner-fs-merge-up
dates&id=6968eb9a818b5f2341c0da5888cfcd399f5aa75d
>
>
>Tried it in several scenarios, and saw a real improvement in 
>the initial
>crawling and indexing (from ~40s to ~28.5s), around 25% faster.

Thank you for trying it. I just tried your branched code. 
Crawling and indexing time reduced from ~232s to ~108s, more than 50% faster.  


>One of the drawbacks seems to be that if the merged sparql 
>update fails,
>several inserts for different files will be failing, instead 
>of just for
>one file. We're discussing the issue already, and will try to find the
>best solution.

When the merged sparql fails, we'd find a chance to update them one by one. 

-Zhenqiang

_______________________________________________
tracker-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list

Reply via email to