Hi!,
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:22:49 +0200, Philip Van Hoof <phi...@codeminded.be> wrote: > Hi Pierre-Yves, > > I should probably have watched the ML more carefully now that it's > committed and too late. My bad, I hope the fact there was no release yet allows us to revert without concern. > +nfo:xmlContent a rdf:Property ; > + rdfs:comment "XML/HTML or other rich representation of a document" ; (...) > > I disagree with this approach. We should not put formatted content into > the Nepomuk storage: > (...) > We can't query it, because its contents are formatted and > we don't have query capabilities to query your formatted contents. And > even if we would allow storage of formatted content like XML, we should > enforce the format using a DTD or other XML schema so that we're sure > that the inserted format is valid and known. I think pushing data into Tracker make sense if the format is understood by several applications. Which is why i first thought "HTML", and pushing there only the *representation* of the note. However in the specific case of notes, XML seemed correct since Tomboy format [1] is already understood by several applications, such as Tomboy, Gnote, Conboy, Tomdroid, ongoing Macboy - and Bijiben. (In the XML case however, we can notice if we stick to Tomboy format, both rich content and metadata are to be stored.) > Don't abuse Tracker to solve your 'whatever' storage needs. Sure, this is not the idea at all. Regards, Pierre-Yves [1] https://wiki.gnome.org/Tomboy/NoteXmlFormat _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list tracker-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
