On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Phillip<[email protected]> wrote:

> Before you rush out and make changes
>
> NOTE it is WIDEN-n  Not WIDEn-N

Well, in this part of the world we use the notation WIDEn-N.

> WIDE2-1 or WIDE2-2     NOT WIDE1-4   or WIDE1-2

Generally the concept was to launch a packet with 'n' and 'N' being
equal, with the exception when wishing to get a single hop only from
the WIDE digipeaters without triggering the fill-in digipeaters, using
WIDE2-1.

By putting WIDE7-7,WIDE6-6,WIDE5-5,WIDE4-4 aliases into the UIDIGI
parameter of the KPC-3 and KPC-3+ units, we created a pseudo-trap to
stop abusive paths. However, anyone knowing the operation of these
units knows that this can be circumvented by using non-standard
numeric values.

You can escape the traps by using a path such as WIDE1-7 to get seven
hops. Something like WIDE5-7 would get 2 hops before being trapped by
the UDIGI WIDE5-5 (which would give one more hop, and then overwrite
it).

We were hoping that Scott would implement a smarter version of hop
limiting, but that didn't happen. (I still haven't arm wrestled Scott
over this yet...)

I'm going to have to break down one day and look at the code that
Scott uses to implement digipeating, and then rewrite it to do
digipeating the "right" way.

James
VE6SRV

Reply via email to