I made some tweaks to the clock recovery code, so yes, the RX performance should be at least a little better.
Scott Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) wrote: > > > I'm not sure how the latest build would have improved reception, but if > anyone else is as curious as I was, I've generated coverage maps for > KC5EVE for his travels on the 29th and 30th. You can see them at: > > http://ldeffenb.dnsalias.net.nyud.net/Tracking/Requests/KC5EVE* > <http://ldeffenb.dnsalias.net.nyud.net/Tracking/Requests/KC5EVE*> > > There are a few holes along the route, but when it had coverage, it had > nice coverage! > > Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - APRS Infrastructure Visualization > > Mark Cheavens wrote: > > On one of my "to do" lists has been to update the firmware in my > > T2-135 to the "latest development build" (June 09) for a while. > > > > I finally got around to it AFTER a long trip (4k miles). The trip was > > frustrating at how FEW packets got decoded. (displayed on the Nuvi) > > > > From my initial testing last night and this morning, all I can say > > is WOW!!!! What an improvement! My normal drive before would result > > in about 10% of the packets being decode and displayed, Now it > > appears to be near 100%. > > > > (Now if we can just get timestamp of when the packet arrived into the > > Nuvi............) > > > > As usual, great work Scott! > > > > Mark > > KC5EVE > > > >
