Yes, and yes.

Scott

Mike Zwingl oe3mzc wrote:
>  
> 
> Scott,
> I guess you are talking abt C13 and C17 ?
>  
> When you replace them, do you see improved decoding?
>  
> sorry for the hassel.
> vy 73 de Mike
> oe3mzc
>  
>  
> 
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* Scott Miller <mailto:[email protected]>
>     *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     *Sent:* Sunday, September 13, 2009 4:42 AM
>     *Subject:* Re: [tracker2] Tracker2/Display & poor decoding
> 
>      
> 
>     Hi Mike,
> 
>     I'm kind of fed up with the 2211 myself. I've been doing a lot more
>     testing on the OT2ms before they ship these days, and a significant
>     portion of them need to have the 0.027 uF capacitors replaced before
>     they ship. I'm not sure the batch sent to the contract manufacturer is
>     really meeting specs.
> 
>     I haven't run into any that didn't get up to par with the capacitor
>     replacement and a thorough cleaning of flux residue. Still, it's a lot
>     of hassle. I've got a few boards on the way to test a new MX614-based
>     layout. When those come in (sometime late in the week) I'll start doing
>     some side by side comparisons. Assuming I can get my crashed workbench
>     PC up and running again. I already bought a replacement, but I can't
>     run the software I need under Vista, and I can't get the machine to
>     load
>     XP Pro.
> 
>     Scott
> 
>     Mike Zwingl oe3mzc wrote:
>      >
>      >
>      > Hi,
>      > we have exactly the same problem and we are no newbies to packet
>     radio
>      > modems.
>      > The XR2211 decoder should perform much better, than it sometimes
>     does in
>      > OT2m.
>      > This modem chip is also used in some other tncs...
>      > but I did not change it for an TCM3105 or similar in the OT2m -so
>     far no
>      > time to test this...
>      > However we observe many OT2m units, that show POOR DECODE on
>     1200baud on
>      > different radios and locations.
>      > Some only decode less than one third of all heard packets..we do not
>      > know why...
>      > However, we have also seen some OT2m units that do significantly
>     better
>      > than that, running same firmware.
>      > We are also aware of the wrong capacitor in the audio filter
>     circuit of
>      > some OT2m serial No. batches, but even if we soldered the correct C
>      > it is still showing very odd effects with poor decode and digipeater
>      > performance.
>      > We would be glad to have some solution offered, since OT2m is
>     starting
>      > to get widely used in our national APRS network as an intelligent
>      > digipeater
>      > or replacing old tncs, that could not do the NEWn-n paradigm.
>      >
>      > hw?
>      > vy 73 de Mike
>      > oe3mzc
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > ----- Original Message -----
>      > *From:* Mark Cheavens <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:mcheavens%40usa.net>>
>      > *To:* [email protected]
>     <mailto:tracker2%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:tracker2%40yahoogroups.com>>
>      > *Sent:* Thursday, September 10, 2009 3:31 PM
>      > *Subject:* Re: [tracker2] Tracker2/Display & decoding
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > With the modem chip used it is rare that a "weak" or "noisy" signal
>      > will get decoded. Is the audio "packet" 9600, 1200, or speaker audio?
>      >
>      > With 1200 baud packet you need to have de-emphasized (sp?) audio to
>      > the modem (TNC). Speaker audio DOES have de-emphasis, as should a
>      > "1200" baud port of the radio.
>      >
>      > (FYI- 9600 had NO pre- or de- emphasis)
>      >
>      > Just because you can HEAR a packet, does not mean the TNC can decode
>      > it. The signal to noise radio need to have a LOT of signal, and VERY
>      > little noise.
>      >
>      > Mark
>      > KC5EVE
>      >
>      >
>      > At 01:02 AM 9/10/2009, you wrote:
>      >
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> Hi there,
>      >>
>      >> I've Tracker2 connected to a Nuvi350 and was wondering why
>      >> sometime it
>      >> took a while before I could see some of the callsigns get into the
>      >> Favorite (after I did a delete all). So, I added an LCD display
>     to my
>      >> Tracker2 yesterday and found out that most of the time, Tracker2
>      >> couldn't decode the packets (i.e. not displayed on the LCD)
>      >> especially
>      >> the weak ones. Now I'm wondering what else I need to do ..
>     Anyway, my
>      >> setup is .. Kenwood TMV71A/Data/BandB <-> Tracker2 with LCD <->
>     Nuvi.
>      >> I brewed my own cable between the TMV71A and the Tracker2.. sending
>      >> packet out does not seem to be a problem. Is there anything in the
>      >> configuration that I need to do?
>      >>
>      >> TIA,
>      >> Mohd/9W2TPT
>      >
>      >
> 
> 

Reply via email to