Check for any obvious loose connections, and it wouldn't hurt to ohm out 
the power leads on the cable.  The T2-301 is tested before it's shipped, 
but the cable isn't since it should be tested at the factory.  Could be 
you got a bad one.

Scott

k7ybz wrote:
>  
> 
> Yup it was powered with my 12V bench supply. That particular supply is 
> fixed and does not have any metering. The LEDs did not light up which 
> was the second indication I had a problem. I will measure the current 
> after I get done playing accountant in about an hour.
> 
> Yea I knew the VHF version was going to be different in some way, which 
> is why I asked.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Larry
> K7YBZ
> 
> --- In [email protected] <mailto:tracker2%40yahoogroups.com>, 
> Scott Miller <sc...@...> wrote:
>  >
>  > I can get you the T2-301 schematic. The FC-301/D part is the same as
>  > the service manual, more or less - they're still working on the VHF 
> version.
>  >
>  > You've got 12 volt power supplied through the cable, right? Do the LEDs
>  > inside light up? Can you measure the current draw? Should be around 
> 80 mA.
>  >
>  > Scott
>  >
>  > k7ybz wrote:
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Scott,
>  > >
>  > > On Friday, for the first time, I tried to power up the T2-301 and
>  > > configure it. The unit appears be non-operational. The configuration
>  > > program would not connect through the null-modem cable and into the
>  > > T2-301 serial + power cable. I checked the wiring up to the T2-301 
> DB-9
>  > > and all is good. I also used all the power-up sequences which would
>  > > allow connection to an OT2.
>  > >
>  > > Later on tomight I was going to get back to troubleshooting and 
> measure
>  > > on board voltages.
>  > >
>  > > 1) Do you have a schematic/parts layout diagram for the internal T2
>  > > board and how it interfaces with the FC-301D?
>  > >
>  > > 2) Is there any difference between the schematics in the FC-301D 
> manual
>  > > and the xcvr as used in the T2-301?
>  > >
>  > > Thanks,
>  > >
>  > > Larry
>  > > K7YBZ
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
> 
> 

Reply via email to