On Wed Feb 14 18:36:01 UTC 2007, Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I took a look at the nozbe site, although I did not actually try it. I do > like the idea of being able to star next actions as a way to manage projects > with a lot of next actions, but would not want it to be forced. Would like > to be able to chose whether next actions need to be starred to show up on > the home page, possibly via a global or project specific preference. > > I don't like the idea that all next actions need to be associated with a > project. To much thinking to get next actions into the system.
Similarly, I've looked at the tour, but haven't signed up (I'm on a self-imposed site sign-up embargo for a bit ;-) ). Generally, I think it looks quite nice, but without using it for a while it's hard to be sure. I also think that having to have next actions associated with a project would be a pain. I have a lot of next actions that don't belong in a project, but even for ones that do belong in a project enforcing that decision at the beginning seems a bit hard. Like Reinier, I think the icons for contexts are quite nice, but it implies that there are hard-coded contexts, which I also don't like much. I think that most people probably have a different set of contexts that work for them, so I'd rather let people name their own. I also sympathise with John's view of hosted web applications - I think it's nice to have a choice. The starring looks pretty cool, but again, it depends how it's implemented, and it would be nice to have a choice about whether to use that or not. I'm hoping that tags might fulfil this role in Tracks in a very freeform way: you can tag an action as 'nextaction' (or whatever), then view a page just showing things you've tagged nextaction. cheers, bsag -- but she's a girl - the weblog of a female geek http://www.rousette.org.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
