bsag wrote: > Generally, I think it looks quite nice, but without using it for a > while it's hard to be sure. I also think that having to have next > actions associated with a project would be a pain. I have a lot of > next actions that don't belong in a project, but even for ones that > do belong in a project enforcing that decision at the beginning seems > a bit hard.
Even if it's that way at the moment, I can't imagine it being enforced for all projects. There could be a simple toggle for each project to show by default just the next action or all of them. > ... > The starring looks pretty cool, but again, it depends how it's > implemented, and it would be nice to have a choice about whether to > use that or not. I'm hoping that tags might fulfil this role in > Tracks in a very freeform way: you can tag an action as 'nextaction' > (or whatever), then view a page just showing things you've tagged > nextaction. I for one aren't using a 'nextaction' tag as it feels too much effort. I'd much prefer for the system to 'promote' one action to being the 'nextaction' automatically for me if it could. And it can if there's an explicit ordering in the actions for a project, as nozbe appears to have. Keep up the good work! Jonathan _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
