On Wed Feb 14 21:09:05 UTC 2007, Jonathan Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > bsag wrote: > > ... > > The starring looks pretty cool, but again, it depends how it's > > implemented, and it would be nice to have a choice about whether to > > use that or not. I'm hoping that tags might fulfil this role in > > Tracks in a very freeform way: you can tag an action as 'nextaction' > > (or whatever), then view a page just showing things you've tagged > > nextaction. > > I for one aren't using a 'nextaction' tag as it feels too much effort. > I'd much prefer for the system to 'promote' one action to being the > 'nextaction' automatically for me if it could. And it can if there's an > explicit ordering in the actions for a project, as nozbe appears to have.
Hmm, but how could it do that intelligently rather than randomly? Because there could be several possible next actions, provided that they don't have dependencies, and then you would be constraining what you could possibly do next. But I have been thinking about this issue and trying to solve it. cheers, bsag -- but she's a girl - the weblog of a female geek http://www.rousette.org.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
