On Fri Feb 23 09:12:19 UTC 2007, Reinier Balt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 18:23 +0000, bsag wrote: > > On Thu Feb 15 09:40:44 UTC 2007, Reinier Balt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 19:15 +0000, bsag wrote:
> > > You could solve this by making the user choose an icon when creating a > > > context. You could let the user pick out an icon from a list of standard > > > icons. I don't think it should be a replacement for the textual name of > > > a context, rather an addition to the name... > > > > I think that might make for clutter, personally (plus slower page loading). > > > > true, but the user chooses this clutter, it is not imposed True, I'll think about it. > > > (Which also makes me think that perhaps the ability to use an icon as a > > > tag could be handy e.g. icon for nextaction or icon for private / > > > work-related actions. This could prevent cluttering the screen with > > > tags) > > > > Though tags are useful for many more things than marking next actions, so > > it wouldn't replace it, in my view. > > > > also true. But if you add three or more tags to an action, it is a lot > of text on the screen. Replacing some of the tags with icons makes this > a little bit better... but it remains subjective if one sees it as > better (it also looks inconsistent, mixing icons and text). Perhaps a > mockup could help. Luke and I did discuss hiding tags in a div (like item notes), so that you'd get an icon of a note to click to disclose all your tags. I'm going to leave it as is for the next release and just see how people get on with it. I think it needs to be lived with for a while. cheers, bsag -- but she's a girl - the weblog of a female geek http://www.rousette.org.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
