> Before that though, I'm wondering about this timezone issue - why does > timezone support matter to tracks, which appears to only support one > timezone and has todos at day-level granularity? (heck, ruby barely supports > timezones out of the box without the tzinfo project)
Maybe to cater to installations where the server is in a different TZ compared to the user? You don't want an overdue stamp just because the server is in EU while you are in US... > As for the interaction with the calendar control, how about configuring the > calendar control to pop from a button next to the text field rather than > when the focus is in the text field - that way people can use either date > entry method? That seems like a nice idea. > As in the way datebocks ( http://datebocks.inimit.com/ ) > works. Or we could just use that now that I stumbled across it. (though it > too seems to have issues with iso vs us date format) Datebocks seems to support both ISO and US format. So instead of letting user specify any format in the "Date format" preference, maybe we can limit it to US or ISO? > Just some thoughts about possible solutions. The keyboard shortcuts that > were proposed will work for some people, but they're pretty obscure :/ I am one of those 'some people' so I guess I win either way :) But yes, Tracks has so far avoided being obscure in terms of usage and this could spoil it! SK ___________________________________________________________ The all-new Yahoo! Mail goes wherever you go - free your email address from your Internet provider. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
