Its early in the day and my brain isn't in gear yet, so I'm not sure I understand what you're proposing - is it that Tracks do nothing to auto-link strings that look like urls because its not that hard to do the html markup oneself? (if you know html)
On 3/20/07, bsag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 20 Mar 2007, at 2:04, James Kebinger wrote: > I threw some amazon links into todo notes fields today and was > annoyed that they didn't become links - I see ticket281 has been > open for a while. Is there a consensus on enabling textile or > markdown syntax for notes fields vs finding and converting links > with a regex etc vs doing nothing? I'm willing to do the legwork to > get any of these options done if we can make a decision on which > one to go with. I'd actually rather manually mark up links with Textile or Markdown. It's a tiny manual overhead versus quite a lot of processing time. Links actually look much nicer if you mark them up because they're more compact, and you can give them a meaningful name (particularly useful for Amazon URLs which are otherwise not very human-readable. But I'm open to suggestions. I think doing it manually is very little work (I tend to mark them up without thinking) for a nicer result. cheers, bsag -- but she's a girl - the weblog of a female geek http://www.rousette.org.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
