On 16 May 2007, at 13:54, Luke Melia wrote:

>
> On May 16, 2007, at 8:30 AM, James Kebinger wrote:
>
>> How does everyone feel about tracks having an inbox (collector) to  
>> jot items in before moving them on to either the tickler or a  
>> project/context designation?
>
> What you describe reflects my main process using tracks today. I  
> have an inbox context that I have my quicksilver/applescript  
> integration pointed to, and I batch process the items in the inbox  
> a few times a day when I visit my Tracks home page in a browser.

I do the same thing.

> Works pretty well for me. The advantage I could see in having a  
> formal inbox would be a more streamlined UI for assigning projects/ 
> contexts/etc to each action in the inbox.

Yes. I'm not convinced it needs to be a special container, though as  
you say, it would make cranking through processing a bit quicker. I  
tend not to collect huge numbers of things in my inbox at one time  
anyway, so it has never been a problem for me.

cheers,

bsag

-- 
but she's a girl - the weblog of a female geek
http://www.rousette.org.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_______________________________________________
Tracks-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss

Reply via email to