On Jan 5, 2008, at 9:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Didn't we try using Chronic before? I have a feeling that we removed > it because there was a problem with dd/mm vs. mm/dd date format > preferences.
Thank goodness for institutional knowledge. That was the problem, and if someone tackles it, they should consider the fact that Tracks is an internationally used app. Cheers from NYC, Luke > But it might be another date parsing library, they all > tend to merge into one in my mind ;-) Of course, it has probably > improved a lot since then, so it might be worth a try for v. 2.0. > > bsag > > _______________________________________________ > Tracks-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss -- Luke Melia [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lukemelia.com/ _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
