The first step is just a config file change and probably packaging up the gem in vendor/gems. That may get some performance improvements immediately without changing a single erb file. To get more performance, one can then look at incrementally changing the erb files over time to allow preprocessing which can get more performance.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Reinier Balt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the impact of this change on current erb / rhtml files? Is this > just > plumbing or do we need to change all erb's? > > Reinier > > --- > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Luke Melia > Verzonden: maandag 12 mei 2008 20:11 > Aan: James Kebinger > CC: [email protected] > Onderwerp: Re: [Tracks-discuss] integrating erubis > > We're thinking of doing this at my company, so I would love to see what we > learn from it on Tracks. +1 > > Luke > > On May 12, 2008, at 12:37 PM, James Kebinger wrote: > > > Hello all. I was thinking about having a go at integrating erubis > (http://www.kuwata-lab.com/erubis/) to replace ERB for speed. If it turns > out to be a good boost, are folks willing to use this instead of erb? Any > concerns? > > More importantly are people willing to use its extensions that provide > preprocessing so that link_to does not have to be called repeatedly. I > don't > know how big the general case is, but if people have lots of tasks, that > may > help quite a bit. > > -james > _______________________________________________ > Tracks-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss > > -- > Luke Melia > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.lukemelia.com/ > > >
_______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
