Luis, could you post your vhost file? As I understand it, you have a domain say example.com and want to run tracks at example.com/foo ? Do you really need that? What if you set up foo.example.com and ran it from there? It shouldn't cost you anything to add a cname record at your registrar. If they want to charge you you should find new registrar! I realize that it should work the way you have it, but with opensource I find that one needs to take the path of least resistance! - Tim -----Original Message----- From: Luis Villa <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:53:57 To: Reinier Balt<[email protected]> Cc: tracks-discuss<[email protected]> Subject: [Tracks-discuss] Re: passenger + tracks unusably slow?
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Reinier Balt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm, it could be that bundle_fu is giving problems. Bundle_fu seems > unmaintained and has problems with ruby 1.9 and subdirs. I manually fixed > the subdirs about a year ago > (http://github.com/bsag/tracks/commit/48fb00b24eccbe8e1ddccfb63db879800c744e > 7e), so perhaps that is acting up now because of all the infrastructure > updates. > > If possible, you could try to see if running tracks from root instead of a > subdir solves your performance problems? Performance is still not great (possibly improved? hard to tell), but the problems with drag/drop of dependencies and with the note icons are fixed. So something is definitely busted in the subdir support in trunk, even if it isn't the cause of the performance problems. Luis _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
