A lot of our users are using webhosts where you cannot upgrade ruby to 1.9. So I think we should keep supporting 1.8.x. But currently Tracks won't work for 1.9, so I'd like to see Tracks 2.2. work both on 1.8.7 and 1.9 with rails3.1.
Reinier Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Stefan Richter Verzonden: maandag 10 oktober 2011 15:40 Aan: [email protected] Onderwerp: [Tracks-discuss] Re: Ruby 1.9 compatibility After writing the mail I could make most Tracks features working with only a minor fix (adding one pair of braces) and using some different gems. Apart from this minor stuff, I am also more in favour of moving completely over to 1.9 and not supporting both versions concurrently. -Stefan From: Reinier Balt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 2:07 PM To: Stefan Richter; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Tracks-discuss] Ruby 1.9 compatibility I made some changes to Tracks a while back to get 1.9 running, but some plugins/gems were failing on 1.9 and I couldn't find replacements and/or replecements that run on rail2.3.x. I was thinking to postpone it to 2.2 so we can move to rails3.1 and use recent gems/plugins that work on 1.9 Reinier Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Stefan Richter Verzonden: zondag 9 oktober 2011 19:53 Aan: [email protected] Onderwerp: [Tracks-discuss] Ruby 1.9 compatibility Hi, I would like to hear what everybody else thoughts on Tracks and Ruby 1.9 are? I just started looking into the compatibility but I am not yet sure, how much I have to change. Thanks, Stefan
_______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
