On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Reinier Balt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> In Tracks' case, updated_at is not a rails internal field used to keep
> track of
>> database content because it's specifically added as part of several
> migrations
>> in the Tracks codebase.
>>
>
> Not true.
> The field was added by a migration to support the rails version that
> introduced auto-mgt of updated_at. Tracks roots are very old :-)
>
>> This sounds like it could be a bug in our API. Steve, could you file an
> issue for
>> this in our bug tracker on Assembla
>> (https://www.assembla.com/spaces/tracks-tickets/tickets). I can't specify
>> when this might get looked at or fixed, but we've had a couple of people
>> working on the API recently and they might be able to pick this up and fix
> it.
>
> I don't think this can be fixed easily, see explanation of Christian.
>
> Reinier
>

Learn something new everyday. :) I assumed since it was part of a
migration that it was added manually. Forgot that you'd have to add
migrations for rails internal stuff too with Tracks being as old as it
is.

Thanks!
--
Matt
_______________________________________________
Tracks-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss

Reply via email to