On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Reinier Balt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've tried the new cache-digests gem to easy add caching to Tracks.
> (I had to clone the gem to enable it running on ruby 1.8.7)
>

Perhaps it would just be better to drop 1.8 support for master
instead? I don't think we need the maintenance burden at this point.
The majority of the ruby/rails community has also made the switch to
1.9

> I have cached Todo, Context (different for home page, tag page and tickler)
> and Project. This brought nice speed improvements for server-rendering.
>
> For who is interested, it is currently on the add_cache branch if you want
> to test it out. I've added bullet and rack-mini-profiler there too. The
> second is enabled in development only so you can see the difference. Be sure
> to enable caching in development in config/environments/development.rb if
> you try this from development environment. Production has caching enabled by
> default.
>
> Please note: The biggest culprit right now is the javascript performance.
> This is not affected in any way by this caching
>

I'm a bit confused. If the biggest culprit is the javascript
performance, shouldn't we be focusing on that? Or is javascript
performance now the biggest culprit since you adding caching?

> N.B. This message is cross-posted to the old and new mailing list. This list
> will be closed shortly. The new list is at
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups=#!forum/tracksapp
>

Please send out a separate announcement for this. This is too
important to be buried here, IMO

> Reinier
_______________________________________________
Tracks-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss

Reply via email to