Paul Lew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I used tramp years ago and recently just start using it again and I > have upgraded from 2.0.2.6 to 2.95.
I apologize for this confusion. I used to use the CVS version numbers for the file tramp.el as the Tramp version number. But later on, I decided that this doesn't really fly and that a proper package version number is needed. For the package versions, I started with 2.0.1. So 2.95 looks younger but is actually really old. The new filename format is a feature of the more recent Tramp versions. Michael has already explained the difference between 2.0.x and 2.1.x. Kai _______________________________________________ Tramp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tramp-devel
