Hi Michael, Michael Albinus wrote: > I will see whether I can find a solution for this. On the other hand, > in Tramp 2.1 seem to be fixes for this problem. Given, that the code > basis between Tramp 2.0 and 2.1 is fairly different, and given that > Tramp 2.1 is now in the Emacs CVS trunk, it might be more efficient to > concentrate on Tramp 2.1. > > > Could you, please, check whether the following patch works for you? It > is based on Tramp 2.0.56, line numbers might be slightly different. > Yeah, that seems to work! Thanks!
/Patrik
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tramp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tramp-devel
