Ulrich Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Have you tried to regenerate configure by calling autoconf? > > Yes, this works of course. (And the resulting configure is identical > to the one in the tarball except for the missing part at the end.) > > That doesn't change the fact that the distributed tarball is damaged, > though.
I see. I don't know exactly why it is damaged, I remember experiencing problems with the mounted filesystem Tramp resides on in the period of end of May. Very likely there won't be a separate Tramp 2.0.57, because Tramp 2.1 has been declared as stable now (see announcement of Tramp 2.1.10). And this, the last released version, seems to be OK. > Ulrich Thanks for reporting, and best regards, Michael. _______________________________________________ Tramp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tramp-devel
