> For this case, there exists already the "pscp" method, which you could > prefer over "plink". > >> and >> >> (setq tramp-copy-size-limit (* 1024 1024)) ; 1MB >> >> By the above setting, I use `plink' up to 1MB. If files size is larger >> than 1MB, I use `pscp'. > > And why have you increased `tramp-copy-size-limit'? Are there > performance problems with the default value?
(In my former message) ;; with compress => "6.61 secs" => "4.516 secs" ;; with pscp instead of plink => "19.338 secs" => "13.209 secs" => "8.152 secs" => "8.422 secs" => "5.828 secs" According to the above result of my test (file size is 613kB), `plink' with compress is faster than `pscp'. And copy by `plink' don't need `login'. In the other hand, if we use `pscp', by default, we must input password whenever `login' by the case. I don't know the way of automatic login without password input well. Maybe I need to read `info' for Tramp later, I think. Those are the reasons why I increased `tramp-copy-size-limit'. BTW, originally I have ever used `plink' as the method. And when I copy remote file to local, I usually do it by `dired-do-copy' on `dired'. (In this case, I do copy by `plink' automatically by default setting. The speed of `plink' is very slow. So I made the patch.) However, by your question, I notice that I misunderstood that `pscp' is used only for file copy. Now I made sure that I can do `dired' by `pscp'. For example, (dired "/pscp:remote-host:/"). Regrettably, if I know `dired' by `pscp' and automatic login without password input, I don't have to make the patch. But, if any part of the patch is effective, plese make use of it. > >> I will do it some day. Sorry, I can't do it possibly for some >> reason. Please don't expect. >> I don't have to do it, I think. >> Thank you, Michael. > > Best regards, Michael. > Thanks, Michael san. (san: honorific title in Japanese) _______________________________________________ Tramp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tramp-devel
