Davis Herring <[email protected]> writes: Hi Davis,
> You've written recently about the inherent ambiguities of Tramp file > name syntax. Is the URL syntax (or, for that matter, the third syntax) > less problematic in this regard? It might be better to switch to it > than away from it... I don't believe this is preferred. Tramp's URL-like syntax competes with url-handlers.el. This is another reason I believe we should remove it from Tramp. If we want to solve the ambiguities in Tramp's primary syntax, we should change the separator between methods and user/host names. Or we should switch to the syntax used in XEmacs. But that's another story. > Davis Best regards, Michael. _______________________________________________ Tramp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tramp-devel
