Nicholas Drozd <[email protected]> writes: Hi Nicholas,
> This turned out to be quite a piece of code indeed. I think this > change respects all the existing requirements. As I said before, this > shouldn't change any behavior, apart from adding the new function and > variable. Feel free to reject. Thanks. However, > + (let ((tramp-minimum-emacs-version "30.1")) > + (should-error (tramp-check-version)))) this does not work as expected. What is this check good for? I understand your intention, but do we need to test this case? Best regards, Michael.
