p.s. yes, the built in tramp.  Unless when I was messing around when first
using tramp and somehow have messed something up.

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 6:15 PM Thomas Walker Lynch <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 9:17 AM Michael Albinus <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Thomas Walker Lynch <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > Hello,
>>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> > Recently my prompt has changed on shells raised with Tramp.  I use
>> > dirtrack, so this messes up Emacs royally.
>> >
>> ...
>> Thanks for the report. I need more data for analysis, though.
>>
>> - Which Emacs/Tramp version are you using? The Tramp version info is
>>   needed only in case you don't use the built-in Tramp.
>>
>
> GNU Emacs 27.1 (build 1, x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.21,
> cairo version 1.16.0) of 2020-08-20
>
>
>> - Have you upgraded Emacs and/or Tramp recently?
>>
>
> This is on Fedora 32,  dnf update just today.
>
>
>
>>
>> - Since I don't use dirtrack myself, could you please give me a recipe
>>   for analysis? Please start with "emacs -Q",
>
>
> Yes it has the same behavior with emacs -Q
>
> Here is what the erroneous prompt looks like:
>
> /sudo:[email protected]:/root/ #$
>
>
> This is what the prompt should look like:
>
> 2020-09-23T15:53:09Z root@localhost§/home/morpheus§
> #
>
>
> Yes that is a two line  prompt.  Makes for reading transcripts much easer.
>
> and describe all steps
>>   (including activating dirtrack) you apply. What do you see, and what
>>   do you expect instead?
>>
>
> Please find attached a reduced dot_emacs_test,  and dot_bashrc_test files
> that also display the problem.
>
> Attached is a .emacs file that exhibits the problem.  There are sections
> for tramp and dirtrack configuration.
> dirtrack is not important here, the question is about the prompt not being
> set.
>
> steps:
>
> 1.  make dot_bashrc_test the .bashrc for root
> 2.  make dot_emacs_test the .emacs for user opening emacs
> 3.  run emacs
> 4.  m-x  shell-root
>
>
> After step 4 the prompt will appear erroneously as noted above when emacs
> -Q was used.  Dirtrack will not be able to find it (and my transcript
> records will be messed up due to not having the UTC time stamps LOL)
>
> Note, this exact same thing happens when using tramp to open a remote
> shell.  Here is the erroneous prompt I get on my server when opening a
> remote shell:
>
> /ssh:thomas_lynch@server:/home/thomas_lynch #$
>
>
> That is a regular user.  Again the prompt in the bashrc files was ignored,
> dirtrack is messed up and no timestamps.
>
> This might matter ..  a year or two ago I reported a sudo security bug
> because scripts may be injected through an inherited prompt.  It is
> conceivable that the prompt behavior going through sudo has changed.  But
> this does not apply here because the prompt is set in the .bashrc and thus
> is set by the process after it is already the other user.  This is not an
> inherited prompt.  Unless they killed the prompt setting altogether.
>
> Thanks Michael et al.  I look forward to your reply, and apologize in
> advance if I've done something stupid here.  Though gosh, it did work.  I
> used it often, prompt was correct from the .bashrc and dirtrack worked etc.
>
>

Reply via email to