I don't know how you've structured things, but I think, from a user
perspective, that it would be fine to just have sub-sections on the html
page, something like:
Tramp Filename conventions
FSF GNU emacs:
blah blah /[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/path/to/file blah blah
XEmacs
blah blah /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/path/to/file blah blah
I also actually think that would be fine in the info file as well,
because whatever is currently there to switch which section is rendered,
didn't work. I'm using XEmacs on a RedHat 7.3 machine, and I upgraded
my tramp package using the package facility, and there is _still_ no
mention of different XEmacs conventions...
Thanks,
H
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 09:16, Michael Albinus wrote:
> Hunter Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > However, I was reading the documentation off of the web, which doesn't
> > mention that the syntax is different for XEmacs under the filename
> > conventions heading. It makes a mention that there is a different
> > example for XEmacs using multihop, but then doesn't include it.
> >
> > And a quick check of the info file shows that the differences aren't
> > mentioned there, either...
>
> Oops, indeed. I'll add a note to the top page for which flavor of
> Emacs this has been created, and how to get the other incarnation.
>
> Kai: should we offer _both_ HTML versions on the project homepage?
>
> > H
>
> Best regards, Michael.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Tramp-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tramp-devel
