On 26/02/14 17:12, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Feb 26, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Carl Wallace <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip>
If this is all that is sought, why not just use TBSCertificate as Rob
suggested and be done? How would that run afoul of ritual compliance?
Because I couldn't figure out what he meant, and he followed by a smilely so I
figured it wasn't serious.
Paul, sorry for being unclear.
I was simply trying to point out that reusing a structure from RFC4210
and reusing a structure from RFC5280 are both equivalent in terms of
structure reuse and feel-good factor.
(Tomas seemed to be implying that RFC4210 scored higher on these metrics).
When you say "just use a TBSCertificate", you mean that CT use that instead of
a certificate structure, yes?
--
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
COMODO - Creating Trust Online
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
